Story Codes: Bondage Narrative - StoryName

Story codes: (As now required by Anna.) (This is the ‘Fine print’). Bondage story - StoryName The narrative covers the aforementioned subjects along with other rather gross and repulsive content. It might offend anyone or everyone. Don’t read it! - If you must, do so at your own risk. Characters: Me, My wife. The Plan. I reside with three women. Primarily my wife, whom I cherish deeply. We have been married for several years. She holds a stable job and is a loving, caring partner. In every way, we are a typical couple. Then there is my submissive. I know she loves me and does her best to please without question or hesitation, serving all my whims and desires. I love her too, treating her fairly and mostly gently. I don’t believe in beating her or causing unnecessary pain. Finally, my Mistress. I hold deep affection for her and follow every command unquestioningly. She is merciless, demanding, cruel yet loving, simultaneously. What do these three women think of this arrangement? I’ve never asked. They are all the same person sharing one body. Similarly, my wife lives with three men, and in a sense, I am them. Shortly after meeting the woman who became my wife, I realized we needed to understand each other’s sexual preferences better, as well as any repressed intimate desires or fantasies. This would be our second marriage, and I wanted us both to be truly open about our deepest feelings. While I was certain we were honest on the surface, I knew something extra was needed to give us the courage to explore more intimate areas. Being somewhat into mild forms of B&D, I sought a way to introduce this concept without seeming like an absolute pervert. I don’t deny being one; I just didn’t want it to appear so openly. Discussing the details of a B&D relationship with neighbors is uncommon, and even difficult with potential or familiar partners. The hard part is starting the discussion. I devised a simple yet somewhat elaborate plan for this. Originally straightforward, some rules were perhaps complex or not easy to explain. We would each find erotic or sexually oriented stories depicting an activity or fantasy that aroused us, interested us, or caught our attention. Ideally, these would be things we’d like to try in real life. To avoid being too confining, we agreed they could be full-length books, short stories, magazine articles, internet posts, or even just a picture of some sexual act. Almost anything goes. The core idea was digestibility within a short time: look at the picture or read a brief story and then enact the scenario ourselves. Limits were minimal: it had to be published somewhere (including online) and not our own work. Ideally printed on no more than three sheets, possibly shrunk or double-sided. Full-length books weren’t excluded if using a different formula. The first requirement was origin details at the top of page one. For books: Author, Title, Publisher, etc. Magazines needed name and issue date; web pages required the URL. This allowed either of us to reference the original work later. Lengthy works needed copies available in or near our home. Additionally, M & F letters were required at the top of page one, presented like a fraction (e.g., M/F for dominant male/submissive female). Though strange initially, this notation indicated gender roles could be reversed; e.g., F/M meant the female was dominant and male submissive. Minor changes to fit our needs could be noted or “penciled in,” such as omitting an ending where he sells the girl. Each story went into its own envelope. Even if everything fit on one sheet, blank paper filled out three folded sheets per sealed envelope to prevent identification by weight/bulk. All envelopes looked and felt identical. Initially, we each chose ten stories: five female-dominant (what I want done to me) and five male-dominant (what I want done to you). The first round was a “Practice session.” Like the final version, we’d randomly pick from twenty envelopes sitting together, opening them over time as permitted. We read contents aloud together but openly discussed our feelings—no holds barred. Responses like “That’s disgusting, I wouldn’t agree” or “That’s cool, I’d try that” were perfect. We discussed likes and dislikes with reasons. Some ideas sparked long discussions; others needed little comment. These first stories weren’t acted out yet. I considered testing the waters by presenting a spicy or personally distasteful scenario to gauge reaction. No rules against it. Limits on sexual or other subjects/actions were non-existent. Once we processed every initial scenario, a second round followed. For this group, whenever in the mood to play, we’d randomly select an envelope and use its theme as a guide for our activities. Scenarios from round one could be recycled; why waste good ideas? We didn’t have to choose sequentially between rounds. After finishing round one, reviewing second-round material with new insights was wise. For more control during the second round, we each had the right to reject a selected scenario if reasons were given and discussed. The dropped scenario led to another random selection. Once an act started, rejection expired.

The scenarios gave us both a much deeper understanding of each other’s sexual preferences, dislikes, and fantasies. The situations presented encouraged open and honest discussion about topics we might never have touched upon without using this tool to break the ice. I have to admit that it took us some time to get through all of the initial scenarios. Often we would get so heated from discussing a scenario that we would end up in bed before we could select and discuss another. By the time the second round came along, we both had a good sense of where the other person stood on pertinent issues. It seems that by this point, we both had enough faith in each other to be determined not to reject any scenario. Naturally, “Safe words” and such were agreed upon. Both of us seemed determined to keep these for use only as a last resort. If a safe word was invoked, there were two choices allowed. The first naturally was “Game over”. The second was a short discussion such as “I’m loving this but this one issue scares me”. I have to say that safe words were almost never used. On the other hand, neither of us is hesitant to make it known in a subsequent session that “This is a payback for…”. The true objective of this game was to get a really good grasp of each other’s likes and dislikes. In some ways, to find out just how far the other person would go. We certainly do test each other’s limits, but each of us is careful to proceed slowly and gently in this area. The final outcome was to develop a trust in the other person that would allow us to no longer require any hint of what was to come. Each of us would simply trust that the other person would know our limits and maybe stretch them, but not exceed them. Although we sometimes speak of it as being so, we do not have a true master/slave relationship in any way. My wife and I are truly equal partners. The last time we filled our box, I counted out twenty-five blank blue 3X5 cards as she counted out twenty-five pink ones. We then traded stacks of cards and verified the counts. Each card was then wrapped in an identical sheet of blank white paper in exactly the same manner and finally sealed in two envelopes, one inside the other. The paper wrapping was to insure that the color of the card was not visible through the initial envelope. The second envelope was a safety security measure. Once all of the envelopes were sealed and shuffled as best we could, I blindfolded my wife. She looked so good I couldn’t resist adding a few other bindings as well. Leading her to the top of the stairs with her back facing the stairs, I handed her the stack of envelopes. One by one she threw the envelopes over her head down the stairs. Still bound and blindfolded, I led her downstairs where she searched for, and eventually found all of the envelopes, being sure to keep them in the sequence she finds them, before she was released. Next it was my turn to perform the same task. This is a somewhat time-consuming task, since no help, or hints are allowed from the other person. What better way to ensure that the envelopes were randomly stacked? The envelopes are stored in a wooden box. This box is locked with two hasps secured by two padlocks. I have the key to one padlock; my wife keeps the other. Opening the box to “Draw an envelope” is a ritual in itself. We each open our lock. Then one of us holds the box above our heads before the box is opened, and a single envelope is removed by the other. The box is then re-locked and returned to its storage location before the selected envelope is ceremoniously opened. We both know that our double locked box and other elaborate procedures have nothing to do with trusting the other partner. This is simply play acting, tradition, and is done strictly for fun. At one time, being in a playful mood, when a pink card was selected I tried to reject her scenario (which hadn’t yet been expressed). I tried to demand that we draw another envelope. My wife wouldn’t hear of it. I ended up being the submissive for the weekend. Like they say, you win some, you lose some, and some are rained out! I think I won that one! The whole idea of double wrapping the cards, and double shuffling them, then double locking them in a box the way we do is without a doubt, truly overkill. It does however, add to the fun. It would be frustrating to pick up a scenario only to find that something required to make it work, such as a pair of handcuff was not available. With this in mind, following the first round of submissions which didn’t require any “hardware” another requirement was added. We now maintain a rather well stocked “Toy box” that contains items that might be used or needed to fulfill our scenarios. Often scenarios call for specific items such as handcuffs, collar, or whatever. From the beginning we have required that if the items required are not part of our normal paraphernalia, and contained in the toy box, they must be provided or made available by the person submitting the scenario. These items may be hidden until needed, but must be surrendered at the time the scenario is selected. At that point these items are added to the contents of the toy box and are thus made available for future use. When we started out we had, and still maintain a real box. Over time the quantity and bulk of items has grown to include a full closet. Of course, any available clothing or household item may also be pressed into service at any time. What eventually developed is the system that we now use. In our case, both enjoy the idea of accepting either the dominant or submissive role. We also liked the randomness of not knowing who will be on top during any particular period. What we did was to simply substitute a scenario or story with blank pink and blue cards that simply indicate who will be dominate. The actual scenario is now made up “On the fly”. The submissive has no idea what the scenario will be. It sometimes turns out that this is true for the dominant as well. In many ways this gives us more freedom than we had before. On the other hand, we each have to keep a supply of fresh ideas in mind. This certainly keeps ones mind active. I have found that not all scenarios fit all occasions. Sometimes what seems like a thrilling scenario must be left to languish until exactly the right opportunity arrives. At other times it just seems natural to meld two seemingly unrelated scenarios into one. We don’t always draw a card. There are times when without warning, one or the other of us will just assume command, and the other becomes the submissive. I must say that life is never dull around our home.